The Radeon RX 5600 XT’s specs expose its whole epic: it capabilities 36 compute fashions and a pair of,304 circulation processors — the identical because the Radeon 5700, nonetheless with slower clock speeds between 1,375MHz and 1,560MHz. It also sports 6GB of GDDR6 memory, 2GB lower than the 5700. Surprisingly, that’s 2GB lower than the entry level RX 5500, nonetheless AMD says the 5600 also has spherical 30 percent more memory bandwidth, which makes up for the adaptation. When measured in teraflops, that truly puts the RX 5600 (7.19 TFLOPS) nearer the 5700 (7.95 TFLOPS) than it does the 5500 (5.2 TFLOPS). Though, it be soundless successfully anxious of the 5700 XT’s 9.75 TFLOPS.
|3DMark Timespy/Timespy Erroneous||Hitman 2||Destiny 2||Witcher 3|
|Radeon 5600 XT||6,689/3,319||83 FPS||100-120 FPS||90-100 FPS|
|Radeon 5700||7,950/3,672||106 FPS||95-130 FPS||92-105 FPS|
|Radeon 5700 XT||8,506/3,871||107 FPS||100-135 FPS||100-120 FPS|
|RTX 2060 Spacious||8,574/4,015||108 FPS||93-110 FPS||86-90 FPS|
1080p benchmarks with absolute most practical graphics settings
As you would possibly well perchance possibly most likely expose from the GPU’s specs, the RX 5600 XT will not be always truly that far off from the 5700, efficiency-like a flash-witted. In fact, both playing cards performed similarly in Hitman 2 and Destiny 2 with high graphics settings at 1080p and 1,440p. The Witcher 3, a notoriously annoying game, reveals more of a distinction between the 5600 and 5700, nonetheless even then the more costly card is handiest spherical a puny faster in 1080p and 1,440p. (Gift: At the commence, the 5600 also bowled over us by outscoring the 5700’s 3DMark results from our preliminary review. But after re-testing the RX 5700, its clear that its efficiency has dramatically improved with more moderen drivers.)
Undoubtedly, there’s bigger than excellent a efficiency distinction between the 5600 and AMD’s more extremely effective playing cards. The Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT we reviewed looks and feels significantly more inexpensive than the reference 5700 and 5700 XT GPUs we saw final twelve months. On the one hand, that’s not going to matter worthy since it be stuck to your case more typically than not, nonetheless the flimsiness of the screen can also trigger disorders as you are installing it. And that case also covers the GPU in a diagram that makes it hard to stoop in the required 8-pin energy connector without some excessive finger gymnastics (to not mention scraped knuckles).
The 5600 XT’s cooling plot is efficacious, although: all over our testing, it hovered between 65C and 70C under load, whereas its more extremely effective siblings reached as a lot as 90C. The Sapphire’s huge fans had been loud, they’re not worthy of a venture while you’re the utilization of a headset. But, while you treasure to bear, you would possibly well perchance possibly decrease the fan stagger thru AMD’s Radeon utility, in swap for a puny larger working temperatures.
The Radeon RX 5600 XT’s graceful energy is its price. You most likely can also ask to witness playing cards treasure the Sapphire Pulse for spherical $289, while 5500 GPUs meander for spherical $180, and the 5700 starts spherical $330. The 5700 XT, AMD’s most extremely effective GPU, sells for $400. And it be price noting, while you are handiest indignant by hitting 60 FPS in 1080p, then you definately can also build $100 by going for a Radeon RX 5500.
Whereas I haven’t examined NVIDIA’s GTX 1660 Ti desktop GPU, which in most cases goes for $300, AMD claims the RX 5600 is spherical 20 percent faster with AAA titles treasure Gears 5 and Crimson Lifeless Redemption 2. In accordance to Futuremark’s database, the 1660 Ti scores 6311 on sensible with the Time Secret agent 3DMark take a look at, which is spherical 300 capabilities decrease than the 5600.
Simply establish, the Radeon RX 5600 is and not using a doubt one of essentially top-of-the-line alternatives this day while you treasure to bear essentially the most fragging bang to your buck. Or not it is speedy sufficient to bring high framerates in 1080p (and in a lot of instances 1,440p); it would not generate worthy warmth; and most importantly, you would possibly well perchance possibly nab it under $300. 1080p gaming will not be essentially the most relaxing topic this show day, nonetheless AMD deserves credit for letting players secure essentially the most out of that resolution, without the expense of leaping to 4K.
Listed right here:
amd, AOLoriginals, day-to-day establish, engadget, Engadget This present day, engadget video, entertainment, gadgetry, items, gaming, tools, GPUs, non-public computing, personalcomputing, Radeon, Radeon RX 5600 XT, review, video playing cards
All merchandise urged by Engadget are chosen by our editorial team, neutral of our parent company. Some of our experiences comprise affiliate links. Whereas you rob one thing thru and not using a doubt this type of links, we are able to also simply compose an affiliate price.